How has the Print Industry been affected by the need for digital media
and the growth of new technologies?
It would be naive to assume that
‘Print is Dead’, but considering the shift from traditional print to digital
media it is safe to say that print is having to battle against the growth of
new technologies. It was inevitable that one day there would be such a demand
for digital media but where exactly does this leave print? A vast increase in
the number of smaller printing businesses having to close over the past few
years highlights the vulnerable position of print, but does this mean to say
that one day print will no longer be valued?
The printing revolution started in
the 1450’s when Gutenberg created the notion of moveable type, which lead to
the printing of the first bible in 1454. A significant development within
print, which meant that for the first time print, could be used as a form of
mass communication to thousands of people at what was considered to be
reasonably inexpensive. By ‘1470’s every city in Europe had established
printing companies’, and by the ‘1500’s around four million books had been
printed’.
‘The
history of printing is an integral part of the general history of civilization.
The principal vehicle for the conveyance of ideas during the past five hundred
years, printing touches upon, and often penetrated, almost every sphere of
human activity..’
Steinberg, SH. (1974), Five Hundred Years of
Printing, (Page 11)
It is print that revolutionised the
form of mass communication and continues to do so with print technology continuing
to develop further. Print played a fundamental part in how society revolutionised
communication; print was at the forefront of communication and it was only
towards the end of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries when the
digital age began to impact on value of print;
‘…As
the digital revolution took hold, newspapers lost half of their advertising
income, one quarter of their subscribers and 30 percent of their editorial
capacity… triggering hundreds of newspaper bankruptcies and tens of thousands
of layoffs.’
Kovarik, B.
(2011), Revolutions in Communication,
(Page 101)
No one could have predicted just
how much the digital revolution would have impacted on the print industry – but
this did not mean that print was going to stop it came to the point where
printed mediums and digital technologies would have to merge and work along
side each other and not against each other, but this was easier said than done.
The beginning of 1995 saw the
publication ‘The End of Print’
showcasing the iconic works by Graphic Designer David Carson, who’s work was
valued for the sole purpose of having broken the traditional rules and
aesthetic of graphic design. Carson’s work didn’t follow the rules of ‘form
follows function’ – he opted for a completely different style, which continued
to impact on and influence many other designers. Carson had designed the book
himself with the text written by Lewis Blackwell. The revised edition of the book from 2000 highlights the
shift between print and digital media and the reasoning behind the title of the
book;
‘The
Internet was firmly established, but few believed it would move so rapidly to
become the overheated commercial reality and hype that it is today… The front-page
news story told of an Internet business that had swallowed up many of the most
venerable brands and content in the print, film and TV media… If such a
business activity seems to involve a certain amount of hype, it also involves a
certain amount of hard evidence: the U.S magazine industry has seen a 50
percent decline in overall ad pages in the 1990’s compared with the 1980’s
while American newspaper have continued their thirty-year losing streak on
circulation. We were not that provocative with out title… there are still those
who cannot accept that the costs and limitations of print will condemn it to
exist as a specialist medium rather than as a means of true mass communication…
Websites and emails are rapidly eroding the need for printed-paper. Now we are a little clearer on how ‘The
end of Print’ links to general culture. There is noting challenging in the idea
that print is most definitely a ‘Sunset Industry’… ‘The End of Print’ was a
title that simply captured the notion that we were seeing the end of our
certainty in print as The Communicator – an illusion that was long overdue for
destruction. ‘
Blackwell, L.
(2000), The End of Print: The Graphic Design of David Carson, 2nd
Edition, (page 7)
The text is in
reply to a letter that was written by a young design student who was focusing
on developing a better understanding on contemporary graphic design legibility.
Blackwell makes an interesting statement about the limitations and cost of
print implying that it is a specialist medium that cannot cater for the mass
audience, but it could be said the internet and other digital mediums too have
specific limitations. What cannot be achieved by print may be better suited by
a digital medium but this still comes at an expense. Digital technologies are
continuing to develop at a rapid rate but this comes at a cost. Before digital
mediums print was considered as a means of mass communication and as times goes
on will continue to serve it’s purpose as a sufficient means of communication. The
decline in advertising in newspapers and other print forms wasn’t an indication
that print was on the decline – it simply meant that there were other means of
advertising through digital mediums which could be seen as more effective.
Advertising within printed mediums still stands strong to this day; new and
innovative forms of print have ensured it is kept alive. An article in Ray Gun
magazine, which has been featured in ‘The End of Print’, discusses the change
from print based to digital design and how this affected Carson as well as
other designers. At the time, which ‘The End of Print’ was published, it was
considered a ‘defining period for the profession as it moved abruptly and
rather bewilderingly into the digital world’ Like most other designers Carson
understood that ‘his work needs to embrace motion and the web.’ Whereas many
designers were keen to leave the world of print behind Carson was aware that
there needed to be a balance between both. By no means did Carson stop working
with print as soon as the digital age emerged, he continued to use print as a
medium for communication but at the same understood how digital mediums and the
web were the way forward.
It was argued
that print would be on the decline because the web seemed more exciting; it was
a innovation that changed people’s lives on a daily basis. During the time of
the digital revolution many designers recognised the need for print based
design that was creative and which explored new possibilities and changed the
way print was seen, it needed to be refreshed and create the same sense of
excitement that digital media was creating.
Jessica Helfand writer
on essays about Graphic Design, New Media, and Visual Culture, states how the
need for digital media and new technologies has been driven by the change in
how society has developed and changed, to the point were print was no longer
able to communicate to the masses as effectively as the internet could. However
it didn’t imply that print would no longer be a viable means of communication,
it just meant that the internet would be better suited for certain means of
communicating. An essay titled
‘Sticks and Stones Can Break My Bones but Print Can Never Hurt Me: A Letter to
Fiona on First Reading The End of Print’ discusses the importance of typography
and ones ability to read words and form sentences, the point being that whether
something is printed or seen on screen it will still say the same thing, ‘A lot
of people say print is dead… Print isn’t dead, sweetheart. It’s just sleeping.’
As digital technologies are developed, new ideas are transforming the way in
which we communicate, but as the digital world develops so does the print
industry. There has never been a time were print as been so innovative and
exciting. The development of digital technologies only furthers the demand for
print that pushes the boundaries.
‘Publishing is Dead, Long Live
Publishing’ – Quite a powerful statement from a well established graphic design
magazine titled ‘Grafik’ that has been around since the 1980’s but also rather
ironic considering it has had to stop being published, for what is the second
time. The underlying reason as to why the magazine stopped publishing was due
to the fact that the publisher no longer wished to support the magazine financially.
Grafik had originally been struggling through the recession hence why they sold
their title to publishers in the first place. During their initial launch after
having seized publishing the team had decided to redirect much of their content
online ‘We will always be in love with print but we’re also excited by how we
can interact with people online. It’s a brilliant medium for creating a sense
of community’ So much content and information is now available online allowing
users to interact with the magazine. It seems like a reasonable point, why not
generate interest through other means of communication, but is this impacting
on the need for printed magazines? An article by Angharad Lewis states that there is no reason
for printed magazines to suffer as long as they;
‘…think
in a completely different way about content, design and readership when
considering the new digital platforms and find a strategy to diversify’ also
raising a point that ‘Some others are refusing too enter the digital world while
others are leaving print behind altogether’.
Lewis, A. (2011), Publishing is Dead, Long Live
Publishing, Grafik Magazine, Vol 1, (No. 189), pp. 57-65
It could be said that many magazines
today have decided to stop working with printed publications and redirected all
their content online with some even creating ‘ezines’. The online magazine requires less start
up cost but can still offer the same amount of advertising space as a printed
magazine. An online magazine requires less financial input as it doesn’t need
to be printed and distributed – which are the main expenses of a printed
magazine and yet it can continue to bring stable revenue. This could be
considered a more viable option, which has less financial risk. At the same
time e-book readers, iPads and tablets have proven to be quite successful, with
the intention that you no longer need to buy a physical copy of a book, as
certain devices enable you to download and enjoy thousands of books in one
place. Many have already taken to the idea of not having to buy books but this
isn’t the case for everyone, there are still those who haven’t lost sight of
the value of a printed book.
Issue 189 of Grafik magazine
featured an article focusing on the introduction of the iPad and how it was
changing the face of publishing. American magazine Wired US set of their first
iPad issue of the magazine, which lead to over 100,000 purchasers, quite a
significant amount but within five months this had dropped to 23,000. With
sales of iPad’s on the increase it would seem that the only problem is that;
‘…consumers
are using the iPad to read digital versions of print publications; they jump
from title to title rather than loyally following a single one. This seems
natural for such a new medium – readers want to see what can be done with the
format.’
Lewis, A. (2011), Publishing is Dead, Long Live
Publishing, Grafik Magazine, Vol 1, (No. 189), pp. 57-65
Even with the introduction of the
iPad it can’t be confirmed there will be a decline in the number of people purchasing
printed magazines, designers and publishers are having to work together to
create a balance between print and digital mediums and considering how they
work together. By assuming that they can work without print by redirecting
their content online would simply alienate what is a well-established vast
audience.
It was 1980 when
Terry Jones first established i-D magazine, and since then it had has gone on
to be one of the leading magazines in the graphic design community. Jones
points out that the survival of their printed magazine relies on their online
presence, as society and culture changes a long with the digital revolution –
so does the format of the magazine.
‘…
The question now is whether these
magazines can move forward. This whole print and non – print argument is an on
going one. What we produce has to become more valuable. And the Value of the
physical object has to go hand – in – hand with what we do online, which is why
online is growing. I see the importance of long – term value, versus the
ephemeral, increasing… The survival of print is more a question of the survival
of the methods by which it’s being distributed’
Moshakis, A.
(2011) The Bright Future of Independent Publishing, It's Nice That, Vol
1, (No. 7), pp. 67-71
Terry Jones confirms
the value of print but also recognises the changes and development of digital
mediums; a stark contrast against the ideas of Lewis Blackwell in ‘The End of
Print’ who states that print cannot survive against digital media. Having
directed a lot of content online i-D magazine is able to cater to a wider
audience but at the same time are able to direct their web audience back to the
magazine. Jones discusses the point that the survival of print is reliant on
the way in which it is being distributed; it can be assumed that not only does
print need to be distributed to a wider audience but it also needs to allow
people to be able to interact with it – something which has pushed digital
communication much further.
The debate
regarding print v digital has been going on for a while now, and will continue
to go on. There are those who have taken to the digital revolution, found it’s
potential and exploited it, and are still finding new ways to develop the
technology further. On the other hand there are those who have stayed loyal to
print, found ways of pushing the boundaries and continued to source innovative
ways of printing without feeling threatened by the rapid expansion of the
digital revolution. Finally there are those like Terry Jones who have developed
a balance, a considered understanding that print and digital mediums must
interact and work together to strive; in essence it would be naive to assume that one could possibly work without the other. Both provide a
sufficient means of communication and will continue to do so for some time. It
cannot be denied that digital media and new technologies have affected the
print industry but it can only be considered a positive effect. It is digital
revolution that has allowed print to develop, a catalyst that has driven print
to become stronger. As Jessica Helfand writes ‘Print isn’t dead, sweetheart.
It’s just sleeping.’
Word count - 1973
Bibliography
1/ Blackwell, L. (1995), The End of Print : The
Graphic Design of David Carson, London, Laurence King Publishing
2/ Blackwell, L. (2000), The End of Print :
The Graphic Design of David Carson, 2nd Edition, London, Laurence King
Publishing
3/ Breede, M. (2009), The Brave New World of Publishing: the Symbiotic Relationship Between
printing and Book Publishing, Oxford, Chandos Printing
4/ Bolter, J. (2001), Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext and the Remediation of Print,
London, Routledge
5/ Gere, C. (2002), Digital Culture, London, Reaktion Books Ltd
6/ Gomez, J. (2008), Print is Dead : Books in our
Digital Age, New York, Macmillian
7/ Helfand, J. (2001), Screen, Essays on Graphic
Design, New Media, and Visual Culture, New York, Princeton Architectural
Press
8/ Jedlicka, W. (2009), Sustainable Graphic Design: Tools, Systems and Strategies for
Innovative Print Design, Oxford, John Wiley & Sons
9/ Kovarik, B. (2011), Revolutions in Communication, New York, The Continuum International
Publishing Group
10/ Lewis, A. (2011), Publishing is Dead, Long Live
Publishing, Grafik Magazine, Vol 1, (No. 189), pp. 57-65
11/ Moshakis, A. (2011) The Non - Formulas Behind a
Magazine, It's Nice That, Vol 1, (No. 7), pp. 59-66
12/ Moshakis, A. (2011) The Bright Future of
Independent Publishing, It's Nice That, Vol 1, (No. 7), pp. 67-71
13/ Steinberg, SH. (1974), Five Hundred Years of
Printing, Suffolk, The Chaucer Press
No comments:
Post a Comment